Nostradamus lives in Moncloa Usually when I discuss politics with other people (practical activity that increasingly more and in turn understand less) quickly classifies me as "right" or less clever as fachilla "or other synonyms. This is especially so when I go to the PSOE, the party to which negative values \u200b\u200bshown by their continuous setbacks, and his manifest inability to make global policies that benefit us all.
However, when defending positions that in no case belong to the more conservative ideology, such as euthanasia, that religious education should be better outside the classroom, greater international cooperation policies and the integration of immigrants, marriage and adoption for gay couples, financial support to the cinema and the English culture ( Quality, not any hoax) ... nobody calls me red, socialist, leftist.
Perhaps this contradiction is because I've always been (for example) the English flag in the folder, as a student, that same flag football team that became temporarily fashionable. The incorrect association of a symbol or a critical certain issues that some believe taboo, cause erroneous categorizations and labels that limit, and one, of course, works to happen when there is no desire to be justified. At this moment, the great Antonio Vega to remember that phrase from his song "One day after another:" ... that one is silent, when you ignore the truth. "
Now that I teach, I always try to explain and instill in my students who never extreme position on a stand, as everything has its nuances, and to read different publications, not his physician. Between white and black there are hundreds of gray that help open the mind to more ideas that we believe exist. Especially when there is evidence that show.
This comes up with an interesting conversation I had the other day with a friend, to thread the topic of unemployment and the economy. With his flag reason, seamless defended the policy carried out by the government of Rodriguez Zapatero, saying also that how we think "right-wingers" that Rajoy has not acted the same, and defended how the Galician. I, however, first asked why so little discretion Rajoy told me about, if I had not taken or defended at any time, and I'm not a member of the PP, or anything that is asome. For him, apparently, there are only two possibilities: either support Zapatero, or am Peper to the core.
In return, I offered a statement of the President (available in any newspaper archives) coming to tell that they actually live in Moncloa Nostradamus:
1 - 03/07/2007 (with 1.9 million unemployed) "I enunciate a simple but ambitious: the next term will come to full employment in Spain."
2 - 03/03/2008 (with 2'3 million unemployed): "The economic slowdown in Spain will not be deep or prolonged, promise to create two million jobs."
3 - 05/09/2008 (With 2'3 million unemployed): "Spain has conditions to reach the levels of employment of full employment
technician.
4 - 30/12/2008 (With 2.9 million unemployed):" We have strength to move forward, in the next March begin to create employment-intensive. "
5 - 30/12/2009 (With figure of 3.9 million unemployed):" In 2010 we will pass from the heavy loss of jobs for moderation in the loss and the creation of jobs at the end of the year.
6 - 11/18/2010 (With 4'1 million unemployed): "The service sector is almost stabilized and the construction industry have slowed their pace of decline clearly.
7 - 01/31/2011 (With 4'2 million unemployed): "The net employment we will create in the second half of this year."
With attitudes like this, do not fit ideologies and false interpretations, you are from left, right, or the ideology they represent the people's princess. Are simply data. Only the first claim, any person with dignity and pride itself had gone home. Anything else is bigotry and sticking to people and parties that do nothing for us.
0 comments:
Post a Comment